|
| From: | James Busser |
| Subject: | Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:59:22 -0700 |
The easiest implementation, however, may be to copy into the signed indicator the same value as was supplied by the test_org (in those cases where the clinician confirms the test_org's indicator) as it might be complicated and a lot of work to have the clinician setting different kinds of technical abnormality flags for different cells... unless we unify them all with a simple asterisk?
Are we entertaining the visual indication of technical abnormality only by a symbol in the padding, as I am wondering if italics could be helpful for those or if people find italics to make (especially smaller) text difficult to read on the screen?
On 31-Mar-08, at 6:51 PM, James Busser wrote:
Technically-abnormal "signing" could have 3 modes:- confirm lab's defaults for all selected (suggest this be the default signing action) - overwrite all selected labs with "technically abnormal" (i.e. ignoring lab's indicator) - overwrite all selected labs with "technically normal" (i.e. ignoring lab's indicator)
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |