gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question


From: Jim Busser
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:40:42 -0700

I confess I am not yet trying the software enough but hope to catch up soon. Even so

On 2-Apr-09, at 5:55 AM, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:

Patient suffers from AV-Block III° and receives a dual chamber pacemaker. Health issue/Grunderkrankung would be AV-Block III° I assume. Pacemaker
implant procedure would be what in that context ?

I see no way to avoid granting that the pacemaker is its own health issue. The patient had a procedure done, which was an insertion, and can have been a progress note attached under AV-blockIII. However at the same time that the progress note is made, I see no escape to adding a new health
issue

        status post-pacemaker insertion

(I would abbreviate s/p) with the details of the pacemaker. This issue would remain active and relevant. If the pacemaker was later removed it would be set inactive but perhaps always relevant because it could be important to not miss this in a later inspection of all things irrelevant like minor self-limited conditions like viral infections

If patient comes in for a pacemaker checkup and I want to write a soap note I would select av-block as health issue. What am I supposed to put in to reflect that the reason for encounter was a pacemaker checkup (not a problem in that
case).

You would instead put it under

        status post-pacemaker insertion

What if the patient suffers from device associated infection. Is this a seperate health issue or is the issue AV-Block III° and the active problem the
device associated infection ?

The infection becomes a new problem until it is resolved, after which it becomes inactive but stays relevant.

I do not think we yet have dependency among health issues so I might consider a brief duplication by entering under the pacemaker issue a text cross-reference

        "Staph bacteremia - see issue"

The AV-block does not need to be touched unless the pacemaker has to be removed and replaced with some temporary treatment in between.

Just my 0.02 :-)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]