gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: 0.5 release schedule


From: Sebastian Hilbert
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: 0.5 release schedule
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:17:39 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.27.25-0.1-default; KDE/4.3.0; i686; ; )

Am Freitag 14 August 2009 23:44:01 schrieb Jim Busser:
> On 14-Aug-09, at 11:55 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when trying to download the new GNUmed tarball via uscan (the Debian
> > tool which inspects a so called watch file for new upstream
> > versions) I
> > realised that this fails.  The problem is that I learned that uscan is
> > not clever enough to ignore a directory which only consists of release
> > candidates so once you create a 0.6 directory I will again get false
> > positives of new upstream versions (see [1]).
> >
> > As a workaround it was suggested [2] to parse the page where you are
> > mentioning the latest released tarball [3] - but this page is terribly
> > out of date (and the reason why I'm writing here).  I think I brought
> > this up here because my watch file now rather mentiones the Wiki page
> > [4] which used to mention the latest released version as a link to the
> > recent tarball as well - but this has changed now.
> >
> > So I will probably switch back for the moment to parse the ftp
> > directory
> > directly which works until you create 0.6.  In the meantime you might
> > consider creating a page which links to the latest tarball again (and
> > please make sure not tor provide outdate information like [3] - it is
> > probably better to remove the page completely if it is not presenting
> > the real status.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> >      Andreas.
> >
> > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2009/02/msg00105.html
> > [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2009/02/msg00106.html
> > [3] http://www.gnumed.de/download/
> > [4] http://wiki.gnumed.de/bin/view/Gnumed/ReleaseStatus
>
> I surmise Sebastian had cloned [3] from yet another page [5]. However
> I have now updated both [4] and [5] making either suitable for uscan.
> Maybe though I broke your parsing (sorry) so please advise if you
> need some syntax restored. Alternatively if Karsten and Sebastian are
> happy with my tweaks, these pages may be stable in their current
> format going forward and simply being updated as appropriate.
>
> [5] http://wiki.gnumed.de/bin/view/Gnumed/InstallerGuideHomeShort

Forget about www.gnumed.de/download

This content will go away soon and should not be used in any way.

Sebatian




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]