[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams
From: |
Jim Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Jan 2011 20:34:02 -0800 |
On 2011-01-01, at 2:16 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Strengths of ingredients are available in
> ref.consumable_substance.amount and .unit.
I have the feeling that the current table structure grew around
1) absence of importable external lists of medications, and therefore a desire
to "build up lists" from user entries, and
2) a desire to escape being "dominated" by corporate brands and dependence on
"purchased" information
Despite that I now possess a free, importable list (for Canada), I'd still like
to better understand the concepts…
For those praxes that lack access to importable lists, we can now have covered
(at minimum)
International nonproprietary names (INN) in EN, FR, DE
ATC (where available) for the above
The problem with populating the table
ref.consumable_substance
from user input is because such a table, taken in isolation, provides no
intrinsic meaning to the amounts and units. Consumable substance amounts and
units, in theory, cover all possible dosage increments between {minimum…
maximum} by taking fractions or multiples of something. But
1) you intend
ref.consumable_substance
to hold only discrete strengths of what is *actually* (commercially) available?
2) maybe the Brand is intended to be related (only indirectly by link table) to
Consumable_Substance ONLY AND EXACTLY where the strength of that
Consumable_Substance is a match to the brand?
3) is the intent to be able to display, in a plugin or widget
based on any substance and strength
--> one-to-multiple Brands known available for that
strength?
… if this is true, then
in the link table, a single Substance / strength would be replicated
once-per-brand
AND
in the link table, a single Brand would be replicated
once per strength (some Brands being available in multiple
strengths) AND
once per substance-in-drug (for combo drugs)
AND
the widget sequence should be
user inputs part of a substance
user is offered values among {substance, strength}
on selecting a {substance, strength}
--> eligible (valid for {substance, strength} Brands are offered
4) I had been worried that the informational value of Brand's multiple
external_codes (across strengths) would be inaccessible to write into the
XML3FreeDiams file, however is there some way that the addition of a substance
to a patient drug list would keep resolvable the specific-to-strength
external_code?
Once I am clearer on how combo drugs are handled, I might have more questions
:-)
-- Jim
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/01/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams,
Jim Busser <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/01/02
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/02
- [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/03
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/03
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Eric Maeker, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/04