[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams
From: |
Jim Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Jan 2011 19:45:19 -0800 |
The list would not accept the attachment, therefore reposted without.
On 2011-01-02, at 6:15 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>> 2) maybe the Brand is intended to be related (only
>> indirectly by link table) to Consumable_Substance ONLY AND
>> EXACTLY where the strength of that Consumable_Substance is a
>> match to the brand?
>
> Not "a match" but rather "defined *by*" the (indirect) link
> into consumable_substance.
So… it sounds that in GNUmed a praxis should like to populate:
consumable_substances
branded_drug
lnk-substance2brand
So… what is the best method of populating them? While I *can* provide separate
files for each of
branded_drug
consumable_substances
I am wondering whether the creation of the link records depends on an external
reference that informs of known relationships (i.e. brands and substances in
one file). Attached is a screenshot of a merged file (filtered for demo
purposes to drugs that contain "ramip"). With restrictions removed, the file
would
list most substances (even at a given amount and unit) multiple times…
… once _per_ unique brand drug that contains the substance
I am also noticing that at the same time that the schema says
unique (description, amount, units)
many of the drugs (apart from ramipril) use INN variant names …
enalapril maleate
enalapril sodium
acebutolol (acebutolol hydrochloride)
acebutolol hydrochloride
so I am wondering how to handle this. When prescribing, I seldom know enough to
care which salt… I *could* script a replacement of the names, keying on the
ATCs (where known) and by this method globally replace with the INN english,
along with some back substitutions (say, paracetamol to acetaminophen as it's
known in North America).
Even if I would do this however, there are many other substances that lack ATCs
by which to resolve and consolidate their names, so shall I simply import these
other substance descriptions?
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/01/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/01/02
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams,
Jim Busser <=
- [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/03
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/03
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Eric Maeker, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: GNUmed substance schema was Re: GNUmed and FreeDiams, Jim Busser, 2011/01/04