[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Encounter types suggested additions
From: |
richard terry |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Encounter types suggested additions |
Date: |
Sun, 22 May 2011 11:07:13 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31-23-generic-pae; KDE/4.3.5; i686; ; ) |
On Friday 20 May 2011 18:53:26 you wrote:
In regard to your questions about consult types:
I think you have to ask yourself (ie the user) why do I want to split these
things up?
For me the basic answer is
1) For continuity of the medical record, so I can be prompted with why I
said/where I said it/to whome did I say it. I don't think its important to
define stuff like case conference numbers - simply the progress notes would
simply state for that entry the persons 'present' during the conferennce.
3) Medico-legal- so that in a court of law I can produce the record which
states I spoke to the patient over the telephone
3) Research/Ordering of records if desired, for example if the patient says I
didn't ring them about something, and I think I did, 200msec later all my
phone conservations would be listed for me to scan and say 'well actually, yes
I did - on 01 May 11, I told you this......"
In regard to entering nursing home notes:
As my program runs over the internet via an i-p address, when, and if I ever
get it finished I will simply log on via wireless and write directly to the
file
server ( Ian and I have tested this as and it works fine in principal - as
per gnuMeds public database), but at the moment, as it's not - I just carry
my laptop with a local database copy so I can view letters etc if needed,
and I write the consults up when I get back.
Regards
richard
> On 2011-05-10, at 4:49 PM, richard terry wrote:
> > I'd be careful how many of these you add - I think it becomes confusing,
> > and at the end of the day I think you have to balance granularity with
> > usability.
> >
> > These are the ones I'm tentitively using, and I must admit I use all the
> > time obvious at consultating rooms, telephone consult and review of
> > correspondence, apart from that not much.
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> You wrote
>
> At consulting rooms
> Case conference
> Email
> Home visit
> Notes without patient present
> Nursing home visit
> Review of correspondence
> Teleconference
> Telephone
>
> How do you use them? For example
>
> Teleconference
> … ≥ 3 people on the phone (only)
> or = phone call with a specialist
>
>
> Case conference
> … = ≥ 3 clinicians (only), in person
> or = other?
>
> Email
> … = content of the email
> or = summary (reference) that the email exists elsewhere
>
> Also do you make your "Nursing home visit" entries at the nursing home e.g.
> on a laptop, or do you input them later?
>