[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnumed-devel] About systems of codification
From: |
Jim Busser |
Subject: |
[Gnumed-devel] About systems of codification |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:55:00 -0700 |
A brief exchange with a friend resulted in
*******************
Hi Jim
Yes, I know about ICPC 2
For me there is one word that stands out "Classification"
ICPC, like ICD, are designed to classify. SNOMED is a Clinical Terminology,
designed for clinicians. It is more granular and you can map "up" to less
granular classification schemes.
I don't think SNOMED replaces ICD, I think it complements it. SNOMED hasn't
been owned by CAP for several years. There is now a large international
standards organization that owns and develops SNOMED.
*******************
Therefore it sounds like if and when we would have available tools that better
suit clinical specifics, we should use them in preference.
For this reason, I would suggest GNUmed praxes need to have the ability to
enable / disable coding systems differentially. I think it is important to be
able to do:
Soap (Subjective / History) LOINC
sOap (Objective / Physical) LOINC
soAp (Assessment) SNOMED-CT
soaP (Plan, treatment given) CPT
Reason for Encounter ICD, ICPC 2
Outcome of Encounter ICD, ICPC 2
Measurements (test results) tables LOINC
CPT = Current Procedural Terminology (American Medical Association)
ICD = International Classification of Diseases (WHO)
ICPC 2 = International Classification of Primary Care (WONCA)
LOINC = Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (Regenstrief Institute,
Inc)
SNOMED-CT = Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine--Clinical Terms (IHTSDO)
-- Jim