Re: Keyed decoding of geometry

[Richard Frith-Macdonald]

Not as far as I can tell ... a dump of all public and private methods  
in
the classes I looked at has no methods with likely looking names, and
it's not present in the public API.

As for why ... it's reasonable to split large/complex methods up for
clarity/readability.

On 27 Jan 2004, at 09:14, Gregory John Casamento wrote:

> Does Apple use a separate method for this?   If not, why should we?
>
> GJC
>
> --- Richard Frith-Macdonald <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 26 Jan 2004, at 13:49, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> >
> > > Looks like we have a disagreement here. What about a compromise for
> > > the time this area is still under heavy development? For now the 
> > > keyed
> > > unarchiving code goes into a separate method that gets called from 
> > > the
> > > specific initWithCode: methods that still contain the old decoder
> > > code. When we are sure about the code that goes there we can see, if
> > > there is any similarity with standard coding making sharing
> > > worthwhile, or not.