[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures
From: |
Hal Murray |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:31:58 -0800 |
address@hidden said:
> This grows more interesting. Recall that we started with WRITE_PAD = 0.01
> and CLOSE_DELAY = 0.4 and Hal Murray reported that working on freebsd.
> Here is what I currently have:
We started with CLOSE_DELAY = 0.2
--------
address@hidden said:
> Hal, can you confirm that the sys.platform.startswith("freebsd") test works
> to identify that platform?
>>> sys.platform
'freebsd9'
>>> sys.platform.startswith("freebsd")
True
>>> sys.platform
'netbsd6'
>>>
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
- [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Hal Murray, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Hal Murray, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures,
Hal Murray <=