[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] RFC 2783
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] RFC 2783 |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:06:20 -0700 |
Yo Hal!
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:57:54 -0700
Hal Murray <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > In Eric's writeup "Introduction to Time Service", he lists the 1PPS
> > via USB as having a deviation of up to 1ms vs. 1PPS via Serial at
> > only up to 5uSec. The USB GPS's I have will have THAT much latency
> > on the PPS? That's a factor of 200, USB vs. Serial! If so, I may
> > shy away from using the PPS on the USB GPS and get another unit
> > from adafruit...
>
> USB is polled. For old/slow USB, the polling interval is 1 ms. I
> think it's 1/4 ms for newer, but all the GPS over USB that I've seen
> are old/slow.
No, USB 1.1 is scheduled, at least on the PL2303. 1024 slots. So we
see in practice about +/1 600 uSec on the GR-601W.
That may seem poor, but is way better than I get with just NTP
over my local GigE net.
> If you are lucky, the "average" of several samples is 1/2 that. If
> you are unlucky, the USB clock will be synchronized (or close to
> synchronized) to the PPS clock and all your samples will be at one
> end or the other of the sampling interval.
Yup.
> Geek alert. The term is Hanging bridges.
> http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/m12/sawtooth.htm
Yup, seen that, on paper, and in practice.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97701
address@hidden Tel:+1(541)382-8588
Re: [gpsd-dev] RFC 2783, Hal Murray, 2015/03/10
Re: [gpsd-dev] RFC 2783, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/03/10