[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?
From: |
John Gardner |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2016 03:21:32 +1000 |
Oh, erm, whoops. Well in my defence, searching for "d" didn't get me
terribly far, haha. Thanks!
Out of curiosity, would there be any way in classical troff to detect if a
macro is defined? Short of diverting the output of .pm I mean...
On 28 April 2016 at 03:10, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > This left me wondering if it's a Groff extension, but I couldn't find any
> > mention of it in *groff_diff*. Or is there something else I'm missing?
>
> Have a look at the `Miscellaneous' section in the `groff_diff' man
> page! The `!' is a NOT operator (which isn't new), and the GNU troff
> extension `d' is documented there.
>
> The canonical documentation, BTW, are the groff info files, cf.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/groff/manual/
>
>
> Werner
>
- [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, John Gardner, 2016/04/27
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Doug McIlroy, 2016/04/27
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, James K. Lowden, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/29