[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?
From: |
James K. Lowden |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:18:51 -0400 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:10:22 +0200
Ingo Schwarze <address@hidden> wrote:
> Take a large manual, for example ksh(1).
> With the mandoc-based implementation of man(1), type
>
> $ man ksh
>
> Then inside less(1), type
>
> :t read
>
> to jump straight to the description of the "read" builtin command,
That's very inviting. Why doesn't it work for *me*? ;-)
$ /usr/bin/mandoc $(man -w ksh) | less -t read
No tags file
--jkl
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/04/27
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Doug McIlroy, 2016/04/27
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?,
James K. Lowden <=
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, James K. Lowden, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, James K. Lowden, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/04/29
Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Doug McIlroy, 2016/04/28