[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:05:01 +0200 (CEST) |
>> The canonical documentation, BTW, are the groff info files
>
> How ironic!
Yes :-) However, `info' is the official GNU documentation format, and
its indexing system is quite good, something groff's output formats
don't provide. On the other hand, I always tried to maintain
well-written man pages that covers everything of groff – as you can
imagine, this lead to double work...
Werner
- [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, John Gardner, 2016/04/27
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Doug McIlroy, 2016/04/27
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, James K. Lowden, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, James K. Lowden, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, James K. Lowden, 2016/04/29