[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:05:05 +0200 (CEST) |
>> However, `info' is the official GNU documentation format, and its
>> indexing system is quite good, something groff's output formats
>> don't provide.
>
> Actually, mdoc(7) indexing is more powerful than info(1) indexing:
>
> http://man.openbsd.org/?query=Ft,Fa~[ug]id_t&apropos=1
>
> Documentation:
>
> http://man.openbsd.org/apropos
I rather meant indexing *within* a single document. By their very
nature, man pages don't need that because everything is on a single
page.
Werner
- [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, John Gardner, 2016/04/27
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Doug McIlroy, 2016/04/27
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, James K. Lowden, 2016/04/28
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, James K. Lowden, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Ingo Schwarze, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, James K. Lowden, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/04/29
Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?, Doug McIlroy, 2016/04/28