guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rebasing or merging? [was: Re: 01/03: gnu: wxwidgets: Add libxtst to


From: Maxim Cournoyer
Subject: Re: Rebasing or merging? [was: Re: 01/03: gnu: wxwidgets: Add libxtst to inputs.]
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:22:24 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)

Hi Felix,

Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> writes:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 5:48 PM Maxim Cournoyer
> <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> When you rewrite the
>> history (by using rebase, say), the existing signatures of the rewritten
>> (rebased) commits are replaced with new ones generated from your key.
>
> That was probably a misunderstanding. I meant to suggest with some
> trepidation that 'master' is merged into the feature branch, and then
> the feature branch is merged back into 'master'. I thought the two
> merge commits would be signed by the person performing the merges
> while the "origin seal" of the accepted change is also preserved.
>
> Please forgive me. I merely hoped to find common ground but apparently
> added confusion rather than clarity.

No worries, cheers!

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]