gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article.rst


From: Toni Alatalo
Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article.rst
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 09:40:30 -0500

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Toni Alatalo <address@hidden>   03/01/27 09:40:25

Modified files:
        storm          : article.rst 

Log message:
        has centralized hypermedia been the norm, anymore?

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/storm/article.rst.diff?tr1=1.39&tr2=1.40&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/storm/article.rst
diff -u manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.39 manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.40
--- manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.39  Sun Jan 26 11:25:23 2003
+++ manuscripts/storm/article.rst       Mon Jan 27 09:40:25 2003
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 ===============
 
 [Note: The following are my notes for what should be written,
-not final text! --benja]
+not final text! --benja .. adding comments in the middle --antont]
 
 The web: servers. {WebDAV}? Links break! Microcosm, alike;
 Xanadu, alike summat. (Tho no link breakage, given permanent ids.)
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@
 
 ->
 It is the norm for hypermedia systems to assume a centralized infrastructure,
-much like the Web. [Discuss Microcosm, Chimera and other OHS here.]
+much like the Web. [Discuss Microcosm, Chimera and other OHS here. is it
+even wise to say it is the norm, if distributed hypermedia is a long trend?]
 Even Xanadu [ref], which went a long way to ensure that links do not break
 when their targets are copied from one document to another,
 required permanent connection to a network of servers to function,




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]