[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The connection bug, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up...
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: The connection bug, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up... |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Oct 2002 16:36:32 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:41:01AM +0200, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> Tuomas Lukka wrote:
>
> >Me:
> >
> >
> >>No, it *is* related to scaling: in the right coordinate system, (2,2)
> >>*would*
> >>be the lower right corner.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Sorry, I mean (1,1) of course.
> >
> >And center would be (0,0) or (.5,.5), depending on the coordinate system
> >convention used.
> >
> >So, I ask again: should we make scaling work in AWT, at least for that
> >case?
> >
> >
>
> More precisely than I said in my other email: SimpleConnection, the
> class in question, uses RenderInfo.xform;
Oh, really? I had forgotten we did that in AWT - yes, that's true,
that would help.
> AFAIK that works just as
> intended. It worked before when the connections were placed in the box
> coordinate systems. Now it doesn't work anymore for the sole reason
> (AFAIK) that the connections are not placed in the box coordinate
> systems any more. So I don't see how making scaling work in AWT would
> help: placing the connection in the box coordinate system is both
> necessary and sufficient. (It is not, however, trivial, because the
> views, which are placing the connections, don't currently know about the
> box cs-- see both VobVanishingClient and RowColView.)
They probably should know.
Tuomas
- Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., (continued)
- Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/05
- Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/05
- Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/05
- Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/05
- Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/05
- Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/05
- The connection bug, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/05
- Re: The connection bug, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/06
- Re: The connection bug, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/06
- Re: The connection bug, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/06
- Re: The connection bug, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up...,
Tuomas Lukka <=
- Re: The connection bug, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/06
- Re: The connection bug, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/06
- Re: The connection bug, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/06
- Re: The connection bug, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/06
- Spaceparts vs. first-class structures, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/05
- Re: Spaceparts vs. first-class structures, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/05
- Applitude connectivity, was: Re: Spaceparts vs. first-class structures, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/05
- Re: Applitude connectivity, was: Re: Spaceparts vs. first-class structures, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/06
- Re: Applitude connectivity, was: Re: Spaceparts vs. first-class structures, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/06
- Re: Applitude connectivity, was: Re: Spaceparts vs. first-class structures, was: Re: [Gzz] Summing up..., Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/06