Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!

[Tuomas Lukka]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:00:02AM +0200, Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:02:25AM +0200, Matti Katila wrote:
> > Well, Janne noticed that there's a lot of things influenced to 
> > bidirectional links and left/rigth direction.
> > 
> > Basically xupdf is pdf viewer and what we have? Only UI with links.
> > Even bib entrys have more information than xupdf has in links. 
> > 
> > There isn't way to tell to user: "Mmmkay, this is referred from this 
> > article". We can only say that there exist a link between articles.
> > OTOH, we can not say that article refers to another or have we made the 
> > link ourselfs.
> 
> These are very good points, and we do need to address them before 
> the article deadline.
> 
> 1) The idea is that the user can also write short notes and link them.
>    This way, the link types should become more apparent. I'll be implementing
>    this ASAP.
> 
> 2) At least my view of xupdf so far is that it's more for "personal" use,
>    so that you know the articles you're browsing.

Forgot to make explicit the question: do you think this will be enough?
Or what would you like to see?

We have a revolutionary interface; how do we present it?

        Tuomas