[Gzz] Is xupdf reasonable?!

[Matti Katila]

[The subject was only considerer to wake you up ;) ]

Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/xupdf article.rst                            
                            
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Janne V. Kujala <address@hidden>    03/01/27 02:25:19
Log message:    link direction/type issue

diff -u manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst:1.25 
@@ -57,6 +57,12 @@
   It could be argued that more variation in the directions would 
   yield more visual features for distinguishing between different links.

+- Do we differentiate between different link types/directions such as
+       - left-right
+       - past-future
+       - source-referer
+       - created by document author/user?


Well, Janne noticed that there's a lot of things influenced to 
bidirectional links and left/rigth direction.

Basically xupdf is pdf viewer and what we have? Only UI with links.
Even bib entrys have more information than xupdf has in links. 

There isn't way to tell to user: "Mmmkay, this is referred from this 
article". We can only say that there exist a link between articles.
OTOH, we can not say that article refers to another or have we made the 
link ourselfs.

This mail's purpose was to raise conversation about xupdf and the issues 
involved to it.


   -Matti