gzz-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!


From: Benja Fallenstein
Subject: Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 17:39:34 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.1-9

Tuomas Lukka wrote:
A Lego brick does not usually have a "meaning", but its meaning is determined
by the context. That's the idea here, too: *we* don't say how you should
use these but just give power.

Forcing the user to choose link styles, colors etc. always from a semantic
list would be taking power away, IMHO.

Now, allowing the user to write, *if she wants*, text on the link or so,
would be good.

Writing on a link is something I'd like, but I think it *may* be orthogonal to link types... not sure.

If we have link types, there must be a default, 'untyped' type of link of course.

-b.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]