Re: How to show link types (was: Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!)

[Alatalo Toni]

On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Asko Soukka wrote:

> We have direction (let's say left or right), but I thought we don't want

no. in zz there is poswards and negwards, and they are defined. or?

> to fix their meanings. E.g. I should be able to create "generalization"
> link either to the left or right from the curren cell, and the after that
> the link should be interpreted as "spesification" when going "backwards"
> to my creation direction.

oh, sounds almost like UML from your part as well :)
a generalization poswards is a specialization (or specification) negwards?

> If we fix left->right = specification and right->left = generalization,
> then it's not problem, but AFAIK we don't want to do it.

of course poswards and negwards don't have to be fixed like that.

> Asko Soukka     | Taitoniekantie 9 A 603 | address@hidden

~Toni