[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lazy-lock vs. jit-lock
From: |
Ian Zimmerman |
Subject: |
Re: lazy-lock vs. jit-lock |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:54:32 -0500 |
On 29 Dec 2005 07:16:25 -0800, shreevatsa <shreevatsa.public@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can get rid of the delay by setting jit-lock-stealth-time to 0,
> which is what I do.
> Looking around on the net seems to suggest that it is lazy-lock that is
> obsolete, not jit-lock.
You misunderstand. It's not a delay; the chunks _never_ get fontified, except
manually with M-g M-g.
--
"Political systems do not deal easily
with long term threats,
even if they have a probability of 100%"
James Schlesinger, a former director of the CIA