[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lazy-lock vs. jit-lock
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: lazy-lock vs. jit-lock |
|
Date: |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:34:50 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> jit means just in time -- since modern CPUs are so fast, jit-lock is too
> slow. I think that's jit-lock's story: being helpful on slow computers.
Huh? Jit-lock tends to lengthen the time to refresh the screen, so it's
really designed for fast computers where redisplay is fast enough anyway.
> I seem to remember that it was recommended not to use jit-lock any more
> because it could be removed some day. (I too switched off jit-lock some
> months or years ago.)
Huh?
Jit-lock is the default and is not on the way out *at all*.
Stefan