Re: List of all functions (recursively) called by a function?

[David Kastrup]

Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> writes:

> Something about GNU Emacs' combination of relative portability (e.g.,
> compared to its contemporary Hemlock, which was written in
> common-lisp, and in many ways more sophisticated -- but probably not
> so portable), relative programmer friendliness (sure elisp sucks, but
> compared to mocklisp...), approachability, good press (it's from the
> author of the original emacs!), "hacker friendly" attitude, and sheer
> dogheaded persistence, ended up winning in the end, despite many other
> programs having a head start...

What use is a headstart without roadmap?  What use is a roadmap without
tar?

-- 
David Kastrup