[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Elisp really that slow?
From: |
조성빈 |
Subject: |
Re: Is Elisp really that slow? |
Date: |
Sat, 25 May 2019 18:05:29 +0900 |
Oops, I sent this as a personal mail first :-(
Resent...
2019. 5. 25. 오후 5:22, Emanuel Berg via help-gnu-emacs <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
작성:
> Ergus wrote:
>
>> 2) Many new features and functionalities
>> (pure editing oriented) have been
>> introduced/proved/improved in other editors,
>> and they have proven to be useful (move line,
>> initial configuration, associative bindings,
>> specific key combinations like in cua-mode,
>> undo/redo and many others).
>
> I don't know what "move line" or "associative
> bindings" are ... but if it is just about
> editing and keyboard-to-function behavior, I'm
> pretty sure we have it.
>
> As for `cua-mode', even I have that, and
> I don't want it, so it must be there to
> begin with.
>
> But I do agree the initial config is very
> unsexy. Especially the GUI Emacs looks awful
> out of the box, to be honest. Obviously you can
> get rid of all that stuff easily enough, then
> get a bright-on-black theme with a more radical
> syntax highlighting, have the cursor stop
> blinking, and a couple of other things I don't
> remember right now. That's a good start and
> should greatly improve the first impression.
> I don't know why it isn't like this to
> begin with.
This is so true... Why is the defaults so bad?̊̈
Just having a default theme will be much better...
>> 3) The development is not focused in the
>> first thing that a user needs when she opens
>> emacs: provide the most comfortable and
>> useful TEXT EDITOR.
>
> Emacs is an interface/tool to operate the
> _entire computer_. Stop thinking of it as
> a text editor only. It isn't true - far from it
> - so I don't know why you do it. And it will
> never happen, no matter what you or anyone else
> say in CAPITAL LETTERS. The only way it will
> happen if you fork it and remove tons and tons
> of useful code. You can do that, of course.
I would say, Emacs is an tool that abstracts operating a computer into text
editing; which makes text-editing capabilities one of the most important part
of Emacs. Text editing is *the* interface of the tool, Emacs.
> --
> underground experts united
> http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal
>
>
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, (continued)
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Óscar Fuentes, 2019/05/17
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/05/30
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, tomas, 2019/05/17
- RE: Is Elisp really that slow?, Drew Adams, 2019/05/17
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/05/31
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/05/27
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Xavier Maillard, 2019/05/29
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/17
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/05/30
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/05/25
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?,
조성빈 <=
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/05/25
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/05/25
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/25
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/05/18
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Van L, 2019/05/19
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, 조성빈, 2019/05/19
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Van L, 2019/05/19
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Ergus, 2019/05/19
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, Ergus, 2019/05/19
- Re: Is Elisp really that slow?, 조성빈, 2019/05/19