[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: package for Email
From: |
Andreas Eder |
Subject: |
Re: package for Email |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 17:28:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Mi 18 Jan 2023 at 13:56, Gottfried <gottfried@posteo.de> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am using thunderbird for emails.
> My question:
>
> 1. Which Email package do you use?
mu4e
> 2. Does it make sense for me as an emacs-newbie to change from using
> thunderbird to an emacs email package?
certainly
> 3. There are
> Rmail, GNU, Wanderlust, Mu4e etc...
It is gnus not GNU.
And there is also notmuch and VM and probably some others.
> 4. I prefer to habe folders because I like to have an overview.
> Mu4e doesn't have folders.
You can have folders with mu4e, I do!
> 5. I want IMAP.
> Do all of them provide IMAP? (does Rmail now provide IMAP)?
Look at mbsync or offline-imap.
> 6. Wanderlust seems to be more difficult to set up, and I still have
> trouble because I am an Emacs-newbie.
I have no experience with wanderlust.
> 7. Which one is easier to use?
That depends on who you ask.
> 8. Should I start with Rmail? and later switch to GNU?
I'd advise zou to start with mu4e. Have a look at the emacs wiki and
other instructions.
> 9. Or is it useful to start with GNU because it has more options and I
> have to learn it anyhow? and I can use it with org-mode?
gnus has a totally different way of handling mail. Use it only if you
are also using for reading usenet news.
> 10. Do all of them have the same or similar keybindings or do I have to
> learn for each one separate keybindings?
They have different keybindings by default, but you can change the bindings.
> 11. What are the benefits compared to thunderbird?
You are inside emacs!
'Andreas
- package for Email, Gottfried, 2023/01/18
- Re: package for Email,
Andreas Eder <=
- Re: package for Email, Milan Glacier, 2023/01/18
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Milan Glacier, 2023/01/19
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Jude DaShiell, 2023/01/19
- Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email, Jean Louis, 2023/01/20