Re: Debunking Emacs merits over GUI - Re: package for Email

[Jean Louis]

* Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> [2023-01-19 14:47]:
> It's a matter of styles; either that or the keyboard is
> preferable to most stuff where the mouse don't have an apparat
> advantage, e.g. GFX, CAD, GIS, FPS ...
> 
> Not OpenSCAD, maybe ...

In computing subject it's purpose is to help human.  

I don't know why we did not yet advance to the motion communication
with computer just as it is shown in movie, if I remember well,
Minority Report, where Tom Cruise moves his fingers in the air and
hologram objects get here and there. 

I similar communication between human and computer available for games
on modern game consoles.

Btw, here is one way how we can implement in Emacs speech recognition:

voice2json | Command-line tools for speech and intent recognition on Linux:
https://voice2json.org/

Then we can command Emacs with speech, that means: keyboard, mouse
plus speech.

It cries for the Emacs package, enabling user to train Emacs by speech
and assign commands, just imagine "tetris", "left", "left", "turn",
"turn", "tuuurn", "f..."

Then there are those mouse motion packages. But not enough.

-- 
Jean

Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns

In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/