[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distributing gnustep-based software
From: |
Sébastien Pierre |
Subject: |
Re: Distributing gnustep-based software |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:56:22 +0100 |
Le 4 févr. 05, à 19:46, Richard Frith-Macdonald a écrit :
Ok, that's fair. I think I will dig the use of libFoundation and
mgStep.
They aren't significantly smaller ... except where they lack
functionality.
You can configure gnustep to omit similar functionality and shrink it
to
about the same footprint. Depends what functionality you need.
I would prefer to stick with GNUstep, because it's maintained and
up-to-date. However, I only need a small subset of the Foundation
(NSString, NSArray, NSDictionnary, NSTask, NSInvocation, NSObject,
NSProxy are the class I use most).
Anyway, I will try to make my own version of the gnustep-base, and see
how to trim it to get a "fat-free" version of it, regarding to my
modest applicative needs.
Thanks again for such a quality feedback :)
-- Sébastien
--
«Too old to be alternative, too alternative to be old.»
<http://www.type-z.org> | Robert Smith, talking about his epitaph.
Re: Distributing gnustep-based software, Alex Perez, 2005/02/04
Re: Distributing gnustep-based software, Adam Fedor, 2005/02/04
Re: Distributing gnustep-based software, Gregory John Casamento, 2005/02/04