Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Trisquel-users] Final Thesis: H-node

[Thomas Harding]

Le 15/05/2013 16:13, Quiliro Ordóñez a écrit :
> El 15/05/13 03:13, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak escribió:
> > Dnia wtorek, 14 maja 2013 o 23:57:39 Quiliro Ordóñez napisał(a):
> > I'll quote Carlos, who responded to me on that off-list (hope this is okay,
> > Carlos?):
> > "I've been participating on the discussions and, in the end, the non-free
> > licenses will stay anyway. Creative Commons doesn't want to take a political
> > stance, and will let other groups to do so (like the recently restructured
> > Free Culture Foundation)."
> >
> > So this ship has already sailed, unfortunately.
> That is too bad. Thank you for the info.
>
> I think that if their name is Creative Commons, those are the licenses
> they should support. If they want to support other licenses that do not
> belong to the commons, they should make another name for that group:
> perhaps Non-creative Restrictions.
Perhaps the way they took is longer than expected, but as far as I know, 
the /final/ goal is to get rid of NC- and ND- .

NC-:
just bullshit

ND- :
That's really not obvious a /content/ (an artifact) has to be freed (as 
in freedom), and even FSF GFDL, which purpose is documentation, 
offer(ed?) for invariant sections.

I acknowledge the fact CC unclearly mixes free and non free, and that's 
make unclear not only to the recipient but the "provider" too what 
freedom (of content) is, so maybe one interest of that group would be to 
make things "more obvious" (such as make clearly different logos and 
licenses names to avoids ambiguity).

Nevertheless, there are still needs to offer an /invariant/ licence on 
works : if you author an essay /on/ Free Software, you certainly won't 
want someone introduces subtles changes to turn it /against/ Free 
Sofware (moreover keeping your signature :).

On the other hand, it's up to another person to seed from your work -- 
and others -- to make what she wants, and allowing /large parts/ of your 
work to be re-employed would be /mandatory to [un]make the ideas [un]free/.

That's the way art and more generally ideas goes, and that's the way 
been forgotten for a century :)

Such a group could advocacy either in a way or the other, but placed 
"here" is an intend to go the right one. Here (that thread), this is "un 
procès d'intentions".

--
TSFH.