El 15/05/13 10:16, Will Rico escribió:
GNU and FSF promote the use of CC By-ND, so at least by their
definition, this license can be considered "free" under the
appropriate circumstances:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses
Making works non-free for the purpose of preserving the intent they were
created for is useless. People will use other's works as they see fit
anyway. Besides, making them nonfree diminishes the work will do in
favor of the intended objective unless the objective is promoting
non-freedom.
Stallman uses non-free licenses for a good cause but gets results that
go the other
way. Sometimes compromises work in favor of freedom. But in
this specific case, it does not.