[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2)
From: |
Sagar Acharya |
Subject: |
Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2) |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:51:10 +0200 (CEST) |
I've been wrong on some fronts but not entirely, thanks to Roberto Beltran for
explaining the business aspect. Becoming a patreon is still donations and
relying on others. I do understand that when the GNU project just gives
selflessly, the chances of people donating back improve. I see KDE slimbook is
a step in right direction but still whether it is completely free software is
questionable. Ecosia a search engine does a great job of earning from searches
(although with bing backend) and using the money to plant trees. That's not
relying on others and paving the path ahead themselves.
GNU's full form is "GNU's not unix" and it's aim was to build a completely free
software system. It is not 90% free and 10% nonfree or 99% free and 1% nonfree.
1% is enough space for nonfree software to inject malware. Completely free
means 100% free. Yes, postfix, python, apache etc. have their contributions but
still they've failed when it comes to freedom (their aim is not freedom, GNU's
is, they fill a small gap). WRT free hardware, it has been found that vendors
can have read only flash chips with malware and Intel ME has complete access
over a system irrespective of OS. I highly recommend Joanna Rutkowska's
"stateless laptop" 2015 paper for more details.
Free software is a first step towards complete computer security. Today
GNU/Linux still has proprietary blobs. GNU/Linux-libre is completely free. How
many people use GNU/Linux-Libre based OSes? How many smartphone users do not
use Android or iOS on their phones today? How many people have hardware free of
"trusted areas"(which the hardware company inserts to "protect" us) and nonfree
driver blobs? Answer to first 2 questions is very few (according to me
definitely less than 10%), and the last question is miniscule.
An application can be made to think that it is root when it is not and it can
be run within a sandbox which makes nonfree applications still manageable but
hardware, booting software and OSes cannot ever be nonfree. The sad part is
today libreboot and coreboot don't work with recent Ryzens and Intel processors.
Point is GNU is losing. Majority of booting software used is proprietary,
majority of hardware used is backdoored and majority of OSes used are nonfree.
With Google having power over every Android user which it may or may not choose
to exploit, freedom is down in the bins. The sad part about freedom is if
others are not free, then you aren't because you are singled out from others.
If I want to be free, atleast significant size of population must be free so I
can hide or mix among them. Things are becoming even worse with drones soon to
come, SaaSS facilitating control even over hardware of user's data and
softwares, and so much infrastructure of website companies based on cloud.
Thanking you
Sagar Acharya
P.S. Chris Franklin, I'll surely check out occupycapitalism
--
Securely sent with Tutanota. Get your own encrypted, ad-free mailbox:
https://tutanota.com
- Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2),
Sagar Acharya <=
- Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2), Roberto Beltran, 2020/07/24
- Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2), Yuchen Pei, 2020/07/24
- Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2), Roberto Beltran, 2020/07/24
- Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2), Miles Fidelman, 2020/07/24
- Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2), Yasuaki Kudo, 2020/07/24
- Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2), Jim Garrett, 2020/07/24
- Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2), Msavoritias, 2020/07/25
- Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2), Amin Bandali, 2020/07/25
- Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2), Roberto Beltran, 2020/07/25
- Re: Practicality of GNU project and libre movement (Sagar Acharya : 2), Stephen Paul Weber, 2020/07/27