[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Adobe Reader 10
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: Adobe Reader 10 |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Mar 2021 20:11:45 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) |
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> [2021-03-20 19:45]:
> greg, with respect, this is defeatist.
That is what I was thinking but could not express myself in English
well.
> i think the key here was laying it on thick with a 24in trowel that it
> wasn't actually about "poor little me", but that the website was in
> flagrant violation of UK laws regarding discrimination, by setting an
> artificially high barrier against *all* people in the UK who were
> poorer than average (cost of proprietary software, high cost of
> computer necessary to *run* said proprietary software)
>
> i have not read what i wrote for many years, but i don't think i even
> mentioned "Software Freedom".
>
> do not for *one second* consider yourself powerless. there will be
> laws in your country that these people will be directly and
> unthinkingly violating.
>
> as Civil Servants the shit will truly hit the fan for them if they are
> found to be in violation of those laws. loss of pensions is their
> worst nightmare.
That is the point, letters written to government with some key factors
related to constitution, laws and regulations can make wonders.
Congratulation.
And don't stop.
Jean
- Re: Fwd: Fwd: Re: Adobe Reader 10, (continued)
Re: Adobe Reader 10, Arthur Torrey, 2021/03/17
Re: Adobe Reader 10, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2021/03/20
- Re: Adobe Reader 10, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2021/03/20
- Re: Adobe Reader 10,
Jean Louis <=