libreplanet-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Carefully written essay asking for proportionality for rms


From: Jorge P . de Morais Neto
Subject: Re: Carefully written essay asking for proportionality for rms
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:30:59 -0300

Hi Miroslav!  Good morning from Brazil.

Em [2021-04-08 qui 15:45:54+0200], Miroslav Rovis escreveu:

> After 69 minutes, my mail does not show on:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2021-04/index.html

I did receive an email of yours from 08 Apr 2021 14:36:58, but I just
take a long time to reply.  I apologize.  And I suppose the mailing list
archives have a delay too.

> Thanks for this work.

You are welcome.

> I read it the first time you posted in this list.

I didn’t remember I had already posted it on this list.

> Firstly, I am unable to view much of
> https://gitlab.com/jorgemorais/justice-for-rms
> Apparently, gitlab.com does not support my Pale Moon browser.

I didn’t know about that.  I am considering getting out of gitlab.com.
But what exactly happens when you try to view my page on Pale Moon?  And
for curiosity: why do you use Pale Moon instead of GNU IceCat or even
Firefox?

> On this second reading, I found, insofar, that there appears to be a
> (probably) new link, but it does not work:
> https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=fIK5st2s3kA

In the latest version that link was removed anyway (the article was too
long and a bit hard to follow, so I am summarizing it).  Anyway, next
time I provide a link to Invidious, I will include a footnote; and in
the footnote, I will provide a link to the video on
the <https://redirect.invidious.io> service.

> Maybe if there be a way to do gradual translation, just as if it were a way to
> somehow further section your work so that, say, a casual reader can only read 
> a
> complete but short part, and the translator can, at first, translate just that
> complete short part, and the info that get/provide-by-translation is still not
> partial?  And then you offer all the details separately because all those
> details are worthy.

Thank you for the suggestion.  I will think about it.  A complementary
approach could be moving more details into footnotes.

Regards

-- 
- <https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/>
- I am Brazilian.  I hope my English is correct and I welcome feedback.
- Free Software Supporter: <https://www.fsf.org/free-software-supporter>
- If an email of mine arrives at your spam box, please notify me.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]