[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?
From: |
jef_e |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you? |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Sep 2006 15:36:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909) |
Duncan wrote:
> "walt" <address@hidden> posted
> address@hidden, excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:46:03
> +0000:
>
>> I've commented twice before that IMO the current behavior of the
>> 'Save Articles' dialog box is backwards: the 'Custom Path' is
>> selected by default, forcing me to change it back to 'Group's
>> Default Path' every time I save something.
>>
>> Is this your intended behavior for that dialog, or is it a bug?
>> Either way, I'd like to hear your thoughts on the subject.
>
> I agree, but has it been bugged yet? If not, it's likely it fell thru the
> cracks and Charles forgot about it.
>
You bugged it once, but it was marked as a duplicate.
This one was posted by Glyn Parker
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349044
I posted to the list in reference to this as well quite a while back, too.
You (Duncan) filed this one
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349188
but Charles marked it as a duplicate.
Initially discussion was about .newsrc, however, preferences.xml also
doesn't get saved. Saving that at edit time shouldn't be a performance
problem, should it? If the newsrc is a performance issue, I'd settle for
at least prefs getting saved :)
That being said, 0.112 has been pretty solid here so far. Still a few
things I'd like to see, but it's mostly wishlist stuff. Stability and
speed have been wonderful.
jef
- [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?, charles kerr, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?, David Kelly, 2006/09/15
- [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Duncan, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?, Darren, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?, Frederic Bezies, 2006/09/16
- Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?, George Sherwood, 2006/09/16
- [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, walt, 2006/09/16
- [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Duncan, 2006/09/16
- [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Duncan, 2006/09/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, jef_e, 2006/09/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Douglas Bollinger, 2006/09/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Douglas Bollinger, 2006/09/16
- [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Duncan, 2006/09/17
- [Pan-users] Feature Request: Bandwidth Throttling, Alen Williams, 2006/09/17
- Re: [Pan-users] Feature Request: Bandwidth Throttling, Brian Pack, 2006/09/18
- Re: [Pan-users] Feature Request: Bandwidth Throttling, Brian Morrison, 2006/09/18