Re: [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?

[jef_e]

Heh - ooops - thats what happens when I don't doublecheck :)

Seems I clicked on the wrong message there to reply too - my previous
message should be in reply to Duncan's other message about 0.112, in
reply to Brian Pack about things not getting saved.

Sorry for any confusion!


jef_e wrote:

> Brian Packposted
>> > [Charles Kerr wrote...]
>>> >>Not very many bugs were reported this week, and most of them were
>>> >>enhancement requests. Either 0.112 is working pretty well, or everyone's
>>> >>burned out from the weekly betas.

>>> >>If it's the former, then RC1 should be the next release IMO.

> duncan wrote
>> > It's been bugged before, but the not saving the group status and what
>> > has or hasn't been read until the app has closed is driving me batty.
>> > 
>> > I've gotten to the point where I simply cannot trust Pan to properly
>> > save it's status over an extended session.

> This one was posted by Glyn Parker
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349044
> I posted to the list in reference to this as well quite a while back, too.
> 
> You (Duncan) filed this one
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349188
> but Charles marked it as a duplicate.
> 
> Initially discussion was about .newsrc, however, preferences.xml also
> doesn't get saved. Saving that at edit time shouldn't be a performance
> problem, should it? If the newsrc is a performance issue, I'd settle for
> at least prefs getting saved :)
> 
> That being said, 0.112 has been pretty solid here so far. Still a few
> things I'd like to see, but it's mostly wishlist stuff. Stability and
> speed have been wonderful.