[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?
From: |
David Kelly |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers? |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:24:56 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 03:06:45PM +0000, Duncan wrote:
> David Kelly <address@hidden> posted
> address@hidden, excerpted below, on Fri,
> 03 Oct 2008 07:47:24 -0500:
>
> > Yes, but one problem is that those who HTML usually don't *see* the
> > point as the dominant broken email client interprets HTML even when it
> > appears in the middle of Content-Type: text/plain. So to them it looks
> > like pretty formatted text rather than the mess it really is.
>
> Even when >-quoted? That was the point... it's >-quoted so it /should/
> show up pretty much as-is.
Doesn't recognize an indented quote as anything special. For many email
clients <b>this is bold</b>, about the only way to pass is to HTML
quote/escape perhaps like this: \<\b\>
Newer versions of some email clients have fixed this issue, its clearly
in the security realm. OTOH spammers know it and a lot of spam is in
HTML in a plain text segment.
--
David Kelly N4HHE, address@hidden
========================================================================
Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
- [Pan-users] clearing headers?, bk011048, 2008/10/02
- [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, walt, 2008/10/02
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, Timothy Hamilton, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, Travis, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, Steven D'Aprano, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, Travis, 2008/10/04
- [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, walt, 2008/10/04
Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, Steven D'Aprano, 2008/10/03