[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: clearing headers? |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 16:38:19 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
David Kelly <address@hidden> posted
address@hidden, excerpted below, on Fri, 03 Oct
2008 10:24:56 -0500:
> OTOH spammers know it and a lot of spam is in HTML in a plain text
> segment.
Heh, that's why non-white-listed HTML mail gets filtered to trash, here.
I've long said if the content needs HTML to make it worth reading, it's
not worth reading in any case, especially when HTML mail (and news) is
the root of so many security vulns. How many mail/news-based security
vulns would have been avoided had the default of certain frequently
vulnerable mail/news clients been NOT to parse HTML? (Might as well add
to that a default of asking the user whether to open or save an
attachment, only offering save in the case of non-data-only formats like
executables and Office docs.) All of them? Certainly most of them.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
- [Pan-users] clearing headers?, bk011048, 2008/10/02
- [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, walt, 2008/10/02
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, Timothy Hamilton, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, Travis, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, Steven D'Aprano, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, Travis, 2008/10/04
- [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, walt, 2008/10/04
Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?, Steven D'Aprano, 2008/10/03