[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [silpa-discuss] Please communicate with mentors properly
From: |
Vasudev Kamath |
Subject: |
Re: [silpa-discuss] Please communicate with mentors properly |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:33:05 +0530 |
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Nithin Saji <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>>I observed today that you added normalizer to silpa-common module, I
>>was surprised you didn't ask or check if there is already a module for
>>this file.
>
> I added the normalizer.py to silpa-common since it was present in the
> utils folder of old silpa and I thought it was a general purpose script
> different from Normalizer module as Normalizer modules description says it
> to be specifically for Malayalam. After I checked the code it seems that
> normalize.py does the same thing as the Normalizer module. I realize that I
> should have given more attention and discussed with you guys about it. I
> will be more careful from now on. .
OK no problems, but I just wanted to tell you importance of
communication in FLOSS communities
>
>>Similarly I noticed you managed to create a new guesslang module when
>>I had already ported and uploaded guesslanguage module to pypi of
>>course it was not forked under Project-SILPA but you could have asked
>>us over mail IRC is not best for communication always. Now either I
>>need to drop entire repo and pypi package and repackage your work or
>>merge your work back into my repo (which is pain).
>
> As for the guesslanguage module, I wasn't aware that it was already ported
> as I assumed all the ported modules would have their corresponding templates
> present in the templates folder of silpa-flask app.
> It will be easier if I drop my guesslang module and add the template folder
> to your repo.
Let me see if I can force merge your changes on top of my repository
if not then we will see how we will go
> Now the silpa-common also contains the langdetect module which is also
> available in the guess-language module. What should be done about this ?
Interesting let me have a look, If I'm right both should not be same
but again I've not checked them properly.
>
> I am aware that all these issues were caused by me making assumptions
> without explicitly asking for them.I will try to avoid it from now on.
Good :-)
>
> And about reverting changes, should I make a new commit on the top to revert
> the changes made ?
Just use git revert <commit-hash>
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
address@hidden|vasudev.homelinux.net}