[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social-discuss] Comments: GNU social relationship manager
From: |
Rich Hilliard |
Subject: |
Re: [Social-discuss] Comments: GNU social relationship manager |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:42:48 -0400 |
Where/how does the user specify a relationship?
Is naming a group the equivalent of specifying a relationship?
Or is relationship specification by a user outside of the Relationship Manager?
;-)
On Jun 23, 2010, at 12:39 AM, Matt Lee wrote:
> On the first screen, contacts are listed both individually, or as a
> list of groups. Clicking a contact or group goes to the second screen,
> whereas selecting multiple contacts prompts for the creation of a new
> group, as well as allowing the user to add the selected contacts into
> a group. For the sake of simplicity, contacts can belong only in one
> group.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/social/design-mockups/red-relationship-1.svg
>
> The second screen allows various privacy and relationship settings to
> be made on the group. By default, GNU social will assume all
> relationships are essentially meaningless, until stated otherwise.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/social/design-mockups/red-relationship-2.svg
- Re: [Social-discuss] Comments: GNU social relationship manager, (continued)
Re: [Social-discuss] Comments: GNU social relationship manager, Ted Smith, 2010/06/23
Re: [Social-discuss] Comments: GNU social relationship manager,
Rich Hilliard <=
Re: [Social-discuss] Comments: GNU social relationship manager, Rob Myers, 2010/06/23