Re: [STUMP] (sub-modules) / Contrib

[Daimrod]

Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden> writes:

>> So my points are:
>>
>> 1. Don't have quicklisp as a dependency
>> 2. Each module define a package
>> 3. Use ASDF for dependency checking
>
> Even if we do want to leave the door open for quicklisp as a
> possibility, that too would require creating module.asd package files.
> Seems like doing that for existing modules would be a reasonable first
> practical step.

I've done it 2 years ago:
https://github.com/daimrod/Stumpwm/blob/master/stumpwm.asd

-- 
Daimrod/Greg