Re: [STUMP] (sub-modules) / Contrib

[Michael Raskin]

>
>So just to be clear: we should totally use ASDF, and using ASDF is
>enough for quicklisp. I think quicklisp is a good thing, and I think
>that all or most of the *current* hard core stump users are also
>quicklisp users. That's great. I just want to make sure that when we
>design the workflow for installing contrib modules we have something
>that makes sense for users who aren't necessarily like us.
>
>(I think the emacs analogy is decent. And to be fair, I compile emacs
>myself, from sources but I don't expect that other people will do the
>same.)

May I ask a simple question?

Can't we build QuickLisp into the StumpWM binary for novice users?