swarm-modeling
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Swarm-Modelling] SWARM on Clusters


From: Andy Cleary
Subject: Re: [Swarm-Modelling] SWARM on Clusters
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:42:18 -0800

At 02:53 PM 1/29/2004 -0800, you wrote:
Andy Cleary writes:
> You just can't do any reasonable level of parallelism without taking a more
 > explicit "partitioned/domain decomposed" approach, and for that a new
 > generation of ABM infrastructure is needed...

It's true that you have to [de]compose things at the domain level.
But, I don't think it's true that you need a whole new infrastructure.
It's more likely that all we need is a new piece of infrastructure.

:-) There's some subtlety between "a whole new infrastructure" and what I said. I am not necessarily saying that all existing infrastructure must be thrown away; a "new generation of ABM infrastructure" could very well be an evolution of existing infrastructure, and in fact more or less, that's what I envision. Many of the existing pieces could stay as they are and serve as the "sequential pieces", and yes some pieces need to be added; but I also suspect that some existing things need to be changed to "bridge" the old and the new.

I realize I'm speaking in broad swaths; I have more detailed notions in mind, but the project that was paying me to do this design work ceased doing so several weeks ago, and so I am forced to put it aside in an incomplete state until that day that a more "enlightened" funding agency resurrects that work. ;-) [Actually, the discussions over the last day or two about getting this kind of project funded come a day late and a dollar short for my use, though with my 20/20 hindsight, I'm in thorough agreement.][And the comment about national labs being a place where interesting but not scientifically meaningful projects can hideout was a LOL hoot!]


Perhaps as we develop ABM patterns, some attempts could be made to
describe this new piece so that we can begin building it.

This is the way forward IMHO. My design work was based on this, although apropos the national lab comment, since we don't actually have any ABM work at this lab I pretty much had to infer what the common ABM patterns are from very indirect sources and our own prototype infectious disease model...

Andy




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]