Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted)

[grischka]

Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Actually I'd like to be able to try 2 prefixs, to reduce the dependencies 
> between glibc and tcc. This way tcc could work well both with the old glibc 
> (which install crt objects in /usr/lib) and the current glibc (which install 
> crt objects in /usr/lib/<triplet>). If not OK for you, I'll have to choose 
> between stricter dependency (only depend on recent glibc) or add a small patch 

Does gcc try prefixes for crt objects?

--- grischka