[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted)
From: |
Thomas Preud'homme |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted) |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Aug 2011 17:39:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.0.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) |
Le samedi 6 août 2011 16:55:15, grischka a écrit :
> Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> >> Does gcc try prefixes for crt objects?
> >
> > I don't know for the upstream gcc but I did a try on my debian system
> >
> > and it is:
> > [...]
>
> Sure, why else should they have 250kb of gcc.c driver code.
>
> > Attached is a patch to implement the solution you were asking for.
>
> Well, note, I was _suggesting_ a solution. Good however that you
> also suggested one, so I changed the option names because I liked
> yours better.
Sorry, suggesting then. Anyway I'm happy to use any solution as long as it
makes tcc work on my system.
>
> Anyway I pushed some patches so you can have crtprefix1:crtprefix2.
> Note that it's also sysrooted. I don't know why you changed that.
Did I? When? I was probably not careful enough.
>
> http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git?a=shortlog;h=e844fb11
I've looked your commit quickly but I mostly notice the "Oh Deer!" in the
commit message. I may have insisted too much on it. It's indeed a bit more
annoying but I already sorted out the correct dependency to work without this
in the next upload.
For the include and library path searching both place is a need since
libraries and headers will come from different packages, some of them
supporting multiarch, some not yet. But for files (crt*.o and even libgcc_s
although it's in another package) they are in only one package and it could be
sorted out through stricter dependency. It put a bit more constraints on the
package manager but that's about all.
So I'm very pleased to have this commit but if it really annoys you then
revert it.
>
> Another patch should also fix the x86_64 bug you labeled as "fails
> to assign in global scope". Actually it wasn't quite that, rather
> that pretty much everything failed, make test and all. ;)
I hope it's not the again one of my commits.
Anyway, thanks again for your work. I'm happy to see I'll be able to drop all
the patches currently in Debian.
>
> --- grischka
Best regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] const_wanted, (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] const_wanted, Thomas Preud'homme, 2011/08/01
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] const_wanted, grischka, 2011/08/01
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] const_wanted, Thomas Preud'homme, 2011/08/01
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] const_wanted, grischka, 2011/08/03
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] const_wanted, Thomas Preud'homme, 2011/08/03
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted), grischka, 2011/08/03
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted), Thomas Preud'homme, 2011/08/03
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted), grischka, 2011/08/03
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted), Thomas Preud'homme, 2011/08/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted), grischka, 2011/08/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted),
Thomas Preud'homme <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted), grischka, 2011/08/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted), Thomas Preud'homme, 2011/08/08
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted), grischka, 2011/08/08
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted), Thomas Preud'homme, 2011/08/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] configury (was const_wanted), grischka, 2011/08/12