Re: [Tinycc-devel] Is anyone on the C standards committee?

[Charles Lohr]

Sorry, I inadvertently replied to this thread instead of the main thread.  I will move my reply there.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:53 PM Charles Lohr <lohr85@gmail.com> wrote:

My suggestion is if possible someone from our group/view should try to apply whatever means we can to keep C clean, clear and simple to implement the standard, allowing the people who feel the drive to "improve things" to direct that at a different language standard, or an offshoot of some sort.  I think a lot of the folks need to play chesterton's fence, until only the most crucial changes percolate up.

I feel it is important to the commercial space that the C standard remains more carefully preserved.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 1:26 PM Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu> wrote:

david.koch@libertysurf.fr wrote in
 <1115648581.65680975.1674678973317.JavaMail.root@zimbra30-e5.priv.proxad\
 .net>:
 ...
 |I think if you want a relatively "stable" yet recent/decent "low level" \
 |programming language might be rust, I guess.

Nim.  (If you really want GC and other such things out of
control.)

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel