[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian
From: |
Henrik Sandklef |
Subject: |
Re: [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian |
Date: |
Fri, 09 May 2008 00:18:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) |
Josh Dukes skrev:
> ...
>
> I don't know much about any of this, but perhaps it would be a good idea to
> seperate out libxnee entirely and make it a dep of xnee. The point of the
> library is to allow the implimentation of xnee type actions in other apps.
> Perhaps it would even make sense to have a seperate dev tree and source
> package, as some groups have done. Perhaps that would just be going to
> far.... but it does make sense to me to break things into three main
> packages, and one dev:
>
> libxnee
Both static (.a) and dyn (.so) lib?
> xnee - cnee, gnee, pnee + all docs
Static or dyn linked libxnee?
> xnee-cli - cnee
I suggest making it statically linked to libxnee
> libxnee-dev
= libxnee + headers ???
But best would be to start with:
xnee-cli / cnee ...
> We at microvu are only really interested in libxnee and xnee-cli, but it
> should'nt be that much more work to do a package of xnee full once xnee-cli
> is done. I haven't read the debian policy documentation yet, so perhaps there
> is another way this should be organized.
>
> Based on that configuration the extra config flags should be...
>
> libxnee: --disable-gui --disable-cli --enable-lib --enable-shared
> --disable-static --disable-doc --disable-gnome-applet
> xnee: --enable-gui --enable-cli --enable-gnome-applet --disable-lib
> --disable-shared --disable-static --disable-static-programs
> xnee-cli: --disable-gui --enable-cli --disable-gnome-applet --disable-lib
> --disable-shared --disable-static --disable-static-programs
>
> libxnee-dev: --disable-gui --disable-cli --enable-lib --disable-shared
> --enable-static --disable-doc --disable-gnome-applet
Oh... have to sleep. After 15 hours of hacking...
> is enable lib and shared redundant? disable-doc because the docs are for
> bins, right? or should docs be enabled for the libs? is gnome-applet already
> disabled by default? Are these conflicting? Does this look totally wrong?
> erm...que`?
..... tomorrow....
/hesa
- [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian, Josh Dukes, 2008/05/07
- Re: [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian, Henrik Sandklef, 2008/05/08
- Re: [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian, Jeremiah C. Foster, 2008/05/16
- Re: [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian, Jeremiah C. Foster, 2008/05/16
- Re: [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian, Henrik Sandklef, 2008/05/08
- Re: [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian, Josh Dukes, 2008/05/08
- Re: [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian,
Henrik Sandklef <=
- Re: [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian, Henrik Sandklef, 2008/05/13
- Re: [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian, Jeremiah C. Foster, 2008/05/16
- Re: [Xnee-devel] Packaging xnee for debian, Jeremiah C. Foster, 2008/05/16