lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?


From: Wayne Buttles
Subject: Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Why use `cp' and `rm' when _WINDOWS defined?
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 12:19:22 -0500 (EST)

On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, T.E.Dickey wrote:

> > What I had envisioned was that DOSPATH would completely go away.  All of 
> > them would be renamed, even if only slightly, so that we were sure when it 
> > all was complete.  During this transition, I suspect we will need ~one~ 
> > #ifdef DOSPATH to surround all the new defines.  *I am hoping on some 
> > input as to where that could go.* 
> good - I've got some ideas for cleaning up the ifdef's (so that most of
> those places where we have VMS or DOS or Unix for wrapper functions really
> should be just one function that's ifdef'd in a header).

Would that stuff be put in userdefs.h?  That is the first place I
thought of to consolodate defines.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]