[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Sks-devel] Re: Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?
From: |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Subject: |
[Sks-devel] Re: Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool? |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:54:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Андрей Коробков wrote, On 04/04/2011 02:11 PM:
> Hello, all.
>
> I want to set up keyserver, but it's only IPv6.
> Would you accept it in the pool?
>
I'm a bit curious, myself, to see how the automatic script handle this
scenario. I just gave the source a quick look and I don't see any
immediate reason why it shouldn't work.
PS! I would recommend not including an A record for the FQDN of the
keyserver in the hostname.
- --
- ----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
http://www.kfwebs.net
- ----------------------------
Nosce te ipsum!
Know thyself!
- ----------------------------
http://www.secure-my-email.com
http://www.secure-my-internet.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)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=rPvj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----