[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?
From: |
Christoph Egger |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool? |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:32:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Андрей Коробков <address@hidden> writes:
> <offtop>
> The only problem is to have such a huge key database being built from dump
> on my memory-limited 32-bit home server. When I tried to do the thing on my
> 64-bit desktop
> and then copy the DB files to server, SKS didn't want to start because of
> something like
> "__db.003 environment not found". May be, these DB files are
> architecture-specific and binary
> incompatible between i686 and x86_64?
> Can I do something other than just sit and wait it for build?
> </offtop>
These db files are incompatible between basically everything. Even using
32bit Little Endian / i386 built ones on 32bit little endian mipsel
fails ;)
Regards
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
pgp2hNhe0PNeR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, Андрей Коробков, 2011/04/04
- [Sks-devel] IPv6 peering, Gabor Kiss, 2011/04/04
- Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, C.J. Adams-Collier, 2011/04/04
- Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, Christoph Egger, 2011/04/04
- [Sks-devel] Re: Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2011/04/04
- Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, Андрей Коробков, 2011/04/04
- Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?, Andrey Korobkov, 2011/04/06