Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?

[Андрей Коробков]

Thanks a lot to all: you are very responsive people :)
I would be glad to peer with you all.

I already have set up domain, connectivity and keyserver.

<offtop>
The only problem is to have such a huge key database being built from dump
on my memory-limited 32-bit home server. When I tried to do the thing on my 
64-bit desktop
and then copy the DB files to server, SKS didn't want to start because of 
something like
"__db.003 environment not found". May be, these DB files are 
architecture-specific and binary
incompatible between i686 and x86_64?
Can I do something other than just sit and wait it for build?
</offtop>

To Kristian Fiskerstrand:
That's exactly what I planned. Yes, I have IPv4 connectivity and can (of cause) 
add A record
if you wish and think it would be better. But I'm very fond of IPv6 and want 
all the internet
to use it sooner. :) So I want my keyserver to be the part of new, better 
internet, not the old one.

The other reason is that I have no reverse delegation on my single IPv4 from
my provider and can't have. In IPv6 I already have my own /64 subnet and can do 
with it what I want.

-- 
regards,
Andrey          <address@hidden>
PGP Key: 
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x177A2DB9EA08BF5D&fingerprint=on

pgpSNchzDYN0l.pgp
Description: PGP signature